New York's Pied-à-Terre Tax: The Definitive Guide
Designed to target the ultra-wealthy, its reach extends well beyond them.
For more than a decade, Albany floated a tax on New York City's most expensive second homes, and the real estate industry fought it off every time. Supporters kept making the same pitch: the city needed the revenue, and non-resident owners of expensive apartments pay little in city income tax, rarely vote in city elections, and draw lightly on city services, which made the group an easy one to target. In 2019 it came close but stalled, and the law sat dormant for seven more years.
On May 27, 2026, the pied-à-terre tax passed the legislature, and Governor Hochul signed it into law the next day.
What took effect on July 1 is an annual surcharge on New York City residential properties that are not used as a primary residence, sitting on top of existing property taxes. It applies to condos, co-ops, and one-to-three family homes above certain value thresholds, and is expected to raise between $340 million and $500 million a year. Properties occupied by the owner, an immediate family member, or a qualifying long-term tenant are exempt; everyone else pays.
Mayor Mamdani announced the tax by filming a video in front of Ken Griffin's penthouse at 220 Central Park South, calling it the embodiment of his promise to tax the rich. Griffin, the founder of Citadel and a Florida tax resident worth an estimated $48 billion, became the face of the law overnight, threatening to pull hiring and investment from the city and raising doubts about Citadel's planned $6 billion tower at 350 Park Avenue. His $238 million penthouse currently carries an $836,526 property tax bill; add the surcharge, and his combined annual bill on that apartment rises to roughly $1.8 million starting this July.
The Griffin story makes for good political theater and a clean illustration of the law at its most extreme, but the law reaches far beyond Billionaires Row, and the more consequential story is what has happened since. The tower fight, at least, appears settled: Vornado's chief executive said this week that financing for Griffin’s Park Ave skyscraper is ready to go, with a $3.3 billion construction loan expected to close, and demolition has been underway since July. The threats to walk away turned out to be a bluff.
The Wonky Rollout
State officials estimated the law would touch 10,000 to 13,000 properties. That estimate did not survive contact with the Department of Finance. On July 24, the city published its first public roster of potentially affected properties: more than 31,000, nearly three times the estimate. The same week, the DOF posted a far broader assessment roll online, covering properties that may be subject rather than properties that actually are, running to nearly 960,000 residential units, a significant share of the city's owner-occupied housing stock.
The backlash was immediate. Longtime primary residents found their homes on a list built for absentee owners of luxury second homes, including at least one sitting City Council member who has lived in the same home since 1994 and spent the week fielding calls from worried constituents. DOF eventually had to add an FAQ entry stating outright that the vast majority of properties on that roll would owe nothing, and that only the roughly 17,000 owners who received an individual letter were actually potentially subject. An agency having to publicly walk back its own list says as much about the rollout as any critic did.
The fallout landed hardest on the exemption deadline, which was itself a source of confusion. Individual letters told some owners they had until August 21 (townhouses and condos) or August 24 (co-ops) to apply, while the city's general deadline was separately cited as August 30, three different dates circulating for what should have been one. On August 1, facing criticism from elected officials and tax attorneys, Mayor Mamdani and Finance Commissioner Richard Lee cut through it with a single extension to September 18 for anyone who received a notice, alongside expanded outreach through co-op and condo boards, senior centers, and elected officials' offices. As of this week, only about 4,800 of the 17,000 owners already notified have started an exemption application, and roughly 2,000 have finished one. The Department of Finance's tax commission will keep accepting appeals through next March, which is the real backstop for anyone who still misses September 18.
None of this is new behavior from Albany. The law's taxable status date, which determines eligibility for a given fiscal year, was set at January 5, 2026, nearly five months before the law was even signed. Owners who needed a qualifying lease in place to avoid the surcharge in its first year were held to a deadline that predated the law's existence, the same pattern as the August rollout: a law moving faster than the infrastructure built to run it.
What Is a Pied-à-Terre?
The term itself is worth a moment. Pied-à-terre is French for “foot on the ground,” describing a secondary residence kept for occasional use by someone whose primary home is elsewhere. The classic New York version is the out-of-town executive with a Midtown apartment for weeknights. But the law's definition is broader: the investor who bought a co-op three years ago and rents it out casually, the owner who relocated to Miami and kept the apartment, the family that inherited a brownstone and never resolved what to do with it. All of them are in a different conversation than they were six months ago.
How the Law Works
The surcharge applies to non-primary residential property: one-to-three family homes valued by the Department of Finance at $5 million or more, and condos and co-ops valued at $1 million or more. If you live in your New York City condo or co-op as your primary residence, none of this applies to you; the law targets non-primary ownership only.
For everyone else, the exemptions are specific. This is not a tax on ordinary rental investment: a property leased at arm's length to a tenant who genuinely lives there for at least a year counts as a primary residence and pays nothing, the same as if the owner lived there. A lease that looks like it exists mainly to dodge the tax will not qualify, but a normal, fully-tenanted investment property is not the target here. The other exemption path is family: a property also avoids the surcharge if it is occupied as a primary residence by the owner or an immediate family member, covering spouses, children, siblings, parents, grandparents, and grandchildren, so a daughter living in your co-op full time keeps you exempt even if you live in another state; a roommate does not.
Two- and three-family houses get a break of their own: the whole property is exempt if even one unit is the owner's primary residence, covering a meaningful slice of owner-occupied Brownstone Brooklyn housing stock. Vacant land, buildings without a certificate of occupancy, unsold sponsor units, and bungalow colonies are excluded outright. Trusts, LLCs, and corporations are covered, with majority owners treated as the owner, so the ownership structures buyers have used for decades to manage tax exposure do not provide a workaround here.
Proving Primary Residence
The Department of Finance issues an annual determination on which high-value properties are not primary residences, and given the rollout, that determination should not be assumed accurate on arrival. Owners have until September 18 to submit proof for this cycle. Separately, the statute gives owners thirty days to appeal after the DOF transmits a notice, not thirty days after it lands in the mailbox. That DOF appeal addresses only primary residence, not valuation, and skips a hearing. A separate, later track through the city's Tax Commission can challenge both primary residence and market value, with deadlines of March 1 for condos and co-ops and March 15 for houses, and it stays open even for owners who never filed a DOF appeal, though choosing it forecloses the simpler DOF exemption route, so it is not a choice to make casually. Miss every deadline and the determination becomes final. False certifications carry a penalty of up to 50% of the surcharge.
To prove primary residence, an owner generally submits a recent tax return listing the property as home address, or a driver's license or other DMV-issued ID showing that address. If neither is available, a voter ID card plus other proof of residency works instead. Owners who split time between residences, recently relocated, or received a notice that looks wrong should be assembling this now. Applications and guidance are at nyc.gov/npsurcharge, or by calling 311.
The Two-Phase Structure
This is the part of the law most coverage has glossed over, and it is the most consequential detail for any owner or buyer.
Phase 1 runs from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2028, using existing DOF valuations that bear only a passing resemblance to market value. The city typically values condos and co-ops on comparable rental income rather than sales price, producing assessments that run 10% or less of actual sale value, which is why Griffin's $238 million penthouse carries a city valuation of $15.5 million and why Phase 1 bills look modest next to the headlines. Rates run 4% on the first $3 million of value, 5.25% up to $5 million, and 6.5% above that for condos and co-ops, and 0.80% to 1.30% for one-to-three family homes above $5 million.
Phase 2 begins July 1, 2028, and both the threshold and valuation method change. Condos and co-ops move to a uniform $5 million threshold, matched to houses, and the city switches from rental-based assessments to comparable sales, closer to what properties are actually worth. Rates drop to 0.80% up to $15 million, 1.05% up to $25 million, and 1.30% above that, across all property types. That cuts both ways. A condo worth $18.5 million today carries a DOF valuation of about $1.1 million, producing a Phase 1 surcharge near $45,000. Valued at its real price in Phase 2, it lands in the $15 million to $25 million bracket at 1.05%, for roughly $194,000 a year. The rate dropped by more than half. The bill went up four times. Owners who pay their Phase 1 bill and stop thinking about it are setting up a real surprise in two years.
The real surprise sits in the middle of the market, not at the top. A condo worth $7 million might carry a DOF value under $1 million today, comfortably below the Phase 1 threshold, and owe nothing. Valued at its real price in Phase 2, it clears the new $5 million threshold and owes roughly $56,000 a year. The owners who most need to model this are not the sub-$2 million starter condos, likely untaxed in both phases, and not the trophy penthouses, whose owners already have people running these numbers. It is the five-to-ten-million-dollar range that has been exempt only because of how the city currently measures value, and will not stay exempt much longer.
The Co-op Complication
Co-ops carry a complication. The city calculates each unit's imputed value by multiplying the corporation's overall market value by its share of total shares, though DOF will not disclose the math behind any specific number, and absence from the published list does not mean a unit is exempt. What remains unresolved is collection: the co-op corporation, not the shareholder, is responsible for collecting the surcharge and is exposed to a lien if it goes unpaid. Boards should review their proprietary leases now to pass the cost through to the shareholder who owes it.
What Buyers Should Be Doing
If you are considering a New York City property as a non-primary residence, the surcharge belongs in your financial model from the first conversation, not as a footnote after the offer is accepted. Find the property's current DOF valuation, model what a comparable-sales assessment might produce after 2028, and factor the surcharge into carrying costs alongside maintenance, taxes, and insurance. Discuss ownership structure with an attorney before closing, since trusts, LLCs, and corporations offer no shelter here. One detail buyers consistently miss: status for the whole fiscal year locks in on January 5 with no proration, so a buyer who closes in March and moves in immediately still inherits whatever status the seller had in January. That liability belongs in the contract, not an assumption. Phase 1 exposure outside the ultra-luxury tier is usually modest. Phase 2 exposure is separate and larger, and it deserves a real answer before you sign anything.
What the Law Does Not Fix
This law does not fix New York City's underlying property tax system, which has favored luxury condo owners over middle-class outer-borough homeowners for decades, a gap well documented and never reformed. The right points to the UK's experience with a similar tax, where luxury homes took 29% longer to sell and 40% of listings cut their asking price, and argues this accelerates the exit of high-net-worth residents. The left argues the opposite, that modest, underassessed Phase 1 bills let the wealthy absorb the cost without changing behavior. Both have merit, and the rollout has added a third critique: the city has not shown it can identify who owes the tax without alarming everyone who does not. The surcharge expires in five years and needs reauthorization, depending on what it raises and who holds power in 2031.
The Bottom Line
New York talked about a pied-à-terre tax for so long that its passage felt almost surreal. Now the surreal part is watching the city administer it. A law aimed at roughly 10,000 properties turned into a notice campaign touching a meaningful share of the city's homeowners, and September 18 is the next real test of whether the Department of Finance can sort out who actually owes the tax before the March appeal window is all that's left.
For most primary residents, including many who received a notice they should not have, the answer ends up being nothing owed, provided the paperwork gets filed. For non-primary owners and anyone weighing a purchase in that category, the answer is more complicated and more urgent than it was in June. Phase 1 is forgiving. Phase 2 is not. And September 18 is a lot closer than 2028.
The Pied-à-terre Tax Law: The Highlights
The tax is an annual surcharge, effective July 1, 2026, on New York City residential properties that are not a primary residence, layered on top of existing property tax.
It applies to condos and co-ops valued at $1 million or more by the city, and one-to-three family homes valued at $5 million or more.
Phase 1, through June 2028, charges 4% to 6.5% on city valuations that typically run far below market value.
Phase 2, starting July 2028, drops the rate to 0.80% to 1.30%, raises the condo and co-op threshold to a uniform $5 million market value, and switches to comparable-sales valuations.
The exemption deadline for this cycle is September 18, 2026, extended after a rollout that mistakenly flagged nearly 960,000 properties. Apply at nyc.gov/npsurcharge or call 311.
DOF appeals are due 30 days after the city sends a notice, not after you open it. Tax Commission challenges are due March 1 for condos and co-ops, or March 15 for houses.
The first bill is due January 1, 2027, and a false primary-residence claim carries a penalty of up to 50% of the surcharge.
A rental property leased at arm's length to a tenant for at least a year counts as a primary residence and is exempt; this is not a tax on ordinary rental investment.
A two- or three-family home is fully exempt if the owner occupies even one unit.
The law expires in 2031 unless Albany renews it.
The Pied-a-terre Tax Law: FAQs
What is the tax actually trying to accomplish?
The city has framed it around three goals: raising revenue, an estimated $340 million to $500 million a year, asking absentee owners to contribute toward city services they are not otherwise funding through income tax, and discouraging the use of New York City apartments purely as a store of value rather than a home. Whether the third goal actually happens is a separate question. A modest Phase 1 surcharge is unlikely to change much for someone holding a $20 million apartment as an investment, at least until Phase 2 rates apply to real market value in 2028.
What properties are subject to the surcharge?
One-to-three family homes valued by the Department of Finance at $5 million or more, and condos and co-ops valued at $1 million or more, provided the property is not the primary residence of the owner, an immediate family member, or a qualifying tenant.
I thought the threshold was $5 million. Why does a $1 million condo owe anything?
Because that $1 million figure is not the condo's market value, it is the Department of Finance's official assessed value, which typically runs 10% or less of what the unit would actually sell for. A condo with a $1 million DOF valuation is often worth $8 million to $10 million on the open market. This changes in Phase 2, when condos and co-ops move to a uniform $5 million threshold based on real, comparable-sales value, the same standard already used for houses.
I own an investment property and rent it out. Does this apply to me?
Not if the lease is real. A property leased at arm's length to a tenant who genuinely lives there as their primary residence, under a lease of at least one year, is exempt, the same as if the owner lived there. This is not a tax on ordinary rental investment. A lease that looks like it exists mainly to avoid the surcharge will not qualify.
How much is the surcharge?
It depends on property type and value, and the two are taxed on different scales through 2028. Condos and co-ops pay 4% on Department of Finance valuations between $1 million and $3 million, 5.25% up to $5 million, and 6.5% above that. One-to-three family homes pay 0.80% to 1.30% on valuations above $5 million. Both schedules shift in Phase 2, when rates drop to 0.80% through 1.30% across all property types but apply to real market value instead of the current assessed value.
I received a notice but do not think it applies to me. What now?
You are probably right to question it. The city's initial outreach flagged nearly 960,000 properties, when the number actually potentially subject is closer to 17,000. Owners have thirty days to appeal to the Department of Finance after a notice is transmitted, and a separate track through the city's Tax Commission to challenge the valuation itself.
Official Pied-à-terre Tax Law Resources:
Work With Craig
Fifteen years selling Brownstone Brooklyn means I have seen a lot of laws come through Albany and watched how they actually land in our market. If you want to talk through what this one means for a property you own or are considering buying, let’s connect.
